I think that's a reasonable upgrade path and that we shouldn't fault them for putting their limited assets on the new product. I got started with PN by taking them up on the discount mentioned above. The noise reduction technology in Photo Ninja is a significant improvement over Noise Ninja, and Photo Ninja includes a wide range of additional capabilities." Note: Noise Ninja customers can upgrade to Photo Ninja for a discounted price. You should make a backup of the software after you download it. We might eventually remove this page as customers transition to Photo Ninja. Photo Ninja includes better noise reduction technology, and we will be providing a Photoshop plug-in for Photo Ninja in the upcoming V1.1 release. However, we will not be making further updates to the software. "The download links here are provided for customers who purchased a Noise Ninja license key before the launch of Photo Ninja.Ĭustomer support for Noise Ninja is still available by email - see the Support page. Here is the statement on the PictureCode website's download page about NoiseNinja: They are just not updating the previous standalone version or providing profiles for it. If you look under the "Noise Reduction" tab in PN there are 3 choices shown as follows: NoiseNinja is now incorporated as the noise reduction method in PhotoNinja. Then there were a couple of new profiles published and I abandoned it After about a year, a year and half, no more updates. This is the same thing that happened with NoiseNinja. They say they are working on a v2 but provide no information on progress. No support for cameras that are not considered new anymore. I bought it and not a single meaningful update in a very long time. You need to do your own investigation on which look you like better.I feel duped. For Web viewing, all four softwares can give you a decent image. Or maybe Iridient can’t handle the X-Trans II sensor of the X100s. I can’t believe it makes that much difference. I’m thinking it’s the noise reduction since the second image is at ISO 800. For the second set, it gave the worst output. For the first set of images, Irident seems to have the best output. I just don’t like the weird tint in the images, especially in the first image. But I think that’s because I’m so used to seeing Lightroom’s renderings. Detail wise, Iridient seem to pull more out. TikTok video from Sam (sambowenphotography): photoninja photoninja goprovideo introduction photography photographer photography canonphotography. The skin tone looks better compared to the other software. But I still can’t get over that weird tint the image has.Ĭapture One wins. PhotoNinja’s version looks pretty good too. Is it the noise reduction that Iridient tried to give? I like Capture One’s output the best. Wow, for these images, Iridient looks the worst. Capture One Iridient Photo Ninja Lightroom Once again, you can click on them to get a better view. Capture One Iridient PhotoNinja Lightroom Once again, these are straight out of the camera using the software’s default settings. The settings for these are f/4.0, 1/250 sec at 800 ISO using my Fuji X100s. I can’t get over PhotoNinja’s weird colors though. The other three are about the same at its default settings. It looks like Iridient captures the details better. Hopefully, you can still tell the difference. For PhotoNinja, I had to take a screen shot again. You can click on them to get a bigger size. TRIAL LICENSE: You can request a two-week trial license key by sending an email request to. However, the Render and File Save operations are disabled unless you purchase and install a license key, available through our online store. These are screen grabs from each software. The Photo Ninja software may be downloaded and installed free of charge. They all have different tones to the image. ![]() ![]() Right away, you can tell these are different. Capture One Iridient PhotoNinja LightRoom The following images are shot at f/4.0, 1/125 sec, at 200 ISO with my Fuji X-E1. Since my trial license for PhotoNinja expired, I had to take a screen shot. But I want to see what gives me the best starting point. ![]() Sure, maybe if we fiddle with stuff, we can get almost identical outputs. The samples are straight out of the camera with no adjustments. Barrel Rock Landscape Photography PhotoNinja Vlog 3An early morning start to try and shoot the sunrise down at my local beach. So you have to figure out what gives you the best possible look that you’re going for. Sure, certain software can bring out details better. This isn’t just a pixel peeping exercise. ![]() I want the best RAW processor to get the best out of the X-Trans sensor. Why portraiture? Because that’s the style of photography I do. So I decided to try them and see how they handle RAF files for portraiture. There has been alternatives such as PhotoNinja, Iridient, and Capture One. We know that everyone complains about how Adobe handles Fuji RAF files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |